Sunday, 29 July 2018

Week 32 - Key Change to Reflective Practice

It certainly has been 32 weeks with many ups and a few downs.  The ups have certainly outweighed the downs.  Change of jobs and change of principal has certainly effected both the ups and downs. 

Just about there ... one more post and it's over, or is it?


Step 1 - What?

The last part of the question that ends with ... or is it?, actually forms this part of my last reflection for Mindlab.  Each week Mindlab has made connections with Our Code And Standards.  The one key change in my professional practice is linked to the standard of professional learning.

Professional learning - Use inquiry, collaborative problem-solving and professional learning to improve professional capability to impact on the learning and achievement of all learners.

What Mindlab has gifted to me is my keenness to learn, and the more I learn the more I can make a difference to my students, and the more it effects them it will effect their future.  Mindlab has made me a more reflective educator.  As Osterman and Kottkamp (2015) state, "Learning is most effective when people become personally engaged in the learning process and engagement is most likely to place when there is a need to learn".  In our course notes this week, they (Osterman and Kottkamp, 1993) also suggested the difference as to how teachers/schools have traditionally undertaken professional learning e.g. bringing in facilitators, sending teachers to acquire knowledge on a course, whereas there is more ownership and upskilling when the teacher uses reflective practice.  This is where the real change takes place ... "behaviours via self-awareness. 

This is where The Mindlab has taken me!

Step 2 - Now What?

Stage 1 - Problem Identification

As I identified in assignment 1, limited or no 'active reflection' (Absolum, 2006), was happening amongst many of the teachers throughout our school, this in turn saw limited or no active reflection happening amongst our students, therefore our students were perhaps, not in touch, owned or even progressed as fast as they might have been, if they were.  It is very important that active reflection becomes part of our, teacher and student, learning cycle.  As we move into our online digital portfolios (Blogs) for all our students, this is certainly becoming more relevant instead of just being a storage of learning tasks.

Stage 2 - Observation & Analysis

This stage became a focus for me when I collected data on what students were posting on their learning blogs.  

(Evidence from my Assignment 1)

Not only was it straight from the 'students' blogs, it was from discussions held with fellow colleagues who had very limited knowledge of Assessment for Learning, and the learning principals that underpin this very important strategy offered by the Ministry of Education.

Stage 3 - Conceptualization

Mindlab has given me the tools and skills to ask those key questions of myself as an educator, and myself as a leader of learning AND follow up with research that form my ideas, thoughts and actions.

Thinking reflectively demands relatively complex mental process and requires the subject of a thought process to become its object.  For example, having applied themselves to mastering a particular mental technique, reflectiveness allows individuals to then think about his technique, assimilate it, relate it to other aspects of their experiences and to change or adapt it.  Individuals who are reflective also follow up such thought processes with practice or action’
(OECD, 2005 - Absolum, 2006)

S6)

Stage 4 - Active Experimentation

This is where it has become really exciting ... Not only have I just become a Deputy Principal, another fellow co-Mindlab student has become the other Deputy Principal at my school.  Having two of us on board has made it easier making changes, implementing new ideas, discussing like-minded ideas on research and/or theories.

In our staffroom, our PLD wall now shows key signs; 
  • What?
  • Now What?
  • So What?
We have identified the 'early adopters' and have started conversations with them using Rolfe's model of reflection

When we have gone into classrooms, we have rounded off our lessons using the same model, posting the student's reflections on the wall, or on their class blogs.

And ... some of our 'early adopters' are doing the same.  It is exciting to see our roller coaster gain traction.

Step 3 - So What?

The school has approached an outside provider to come and work with us for a year, with the focus on Assessment For Learning.  Which will then continue the small learning and teaching we are working with our staff on.  

Since, undertaking Mindlab, many of our teachers have grown an interest of what we have been learning, they have observed us making changes to our own practice, and they are taking part in the professional conversations we are having.

References

Absolum, M. (2006). Clarity in the classroom: Using formative assessment. Auckland, New Zealand: Hachette Livre NZ Ltd.

Osterman, K. & Kottkamp, R.(1993). Reflective Practice for Educators.California.Corwin Press, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.itslifejimbutn otasweknowit.org.uk/files

Osterman, K. F., & Kottkamp, R. B. (2015). Reflective practice for educators: professional development to improve student learning.(2nd ed.) New York: Skyhorse Publishing.

Ministry of Education (2017). Our code, our standards. Retrieved from



Week 31 - Indigenous Knowledge and Cultural Responsiveness





Again, in this blog post I will be  using Rolfe et al.s Model of Reflection(2001)

  1. What?
  2. So What?
  3. Now What?

Step 1 - What?

I was lucky enough to hear Dr Ann Milne speak at uLearn 2017.  Her key message is reflected in the above sketch-note.  There were may challenges I took from her keynote but the key one is reflected in the yellow outlined box.  To enable kids to be Māori, cultural identity has to be embedded in every activity of the school day.

Image result for ann milne ulearn 2017

I always thought of myself as being extremely culturally aware and responsive.  Why? Because I'm Māori of course.  However, upon hearing Anne Milne speak words are not enough to express how thought provoking her message was.

I ask myself and the  teachers at my school how do our Māori learners see that we value their culture rather than, and I quote Milne (2013), "learn about the place of colour and the importance of staying within the pre-determined boundaries and expectations."

Step 2 - So What?

We have different levels of the Mauri Model happening in at our school.  The Senior Management team, which I am part or, is actively working at within the Te Taunga o te Mauri Moe - State of Being of Mauri Ora (Actions and Expressions of  TRANSFORMATIVE LEADERSHIP)

I led our  whānau group and staff through the  development of our local Maniapoto curriculum where our vision is: By the time all our students graduate from our school they will have a connection with and knowledge of our local Manapoto landmarks, histories, values and tikanga.  This document supports teachers planning and making learning more authentic and meaningful by focusing on our local area.  Our school Maniapoto document is modelled from Te Takanga o Te Wa, Ministry of Education publication.

However, I feel we still have many of our teachers within Te Taunga o te Mauri Moe - State of Being of Mauri Oho (Level 1: Actions and Expressions of INACTIVITY.)    Signage that is up but never  used or referred to, they were great 'place holders' on the wall.  Some stand alone te reo lessons  that they  can tick off to say the had 'done' that lesson, but only ever used in the 20 minutes a week it is given.

What has been exciting this year is the employment of teachers who are 'Te Taunga o te Mauri Moe - State of Being of Mauri Oho (Actions and Expressions of PROACTIVE.)  Attempting to build relationships with whānau and are actively engaged in all tuturu Māori

Step 3 - Now What?

I believe that our school needs to create a multi levelled learning environment where traditional Māori methods, such as tuakana / teina, as described my the Ministry of Education TKI website - site 1site 2.  To achieve many of these thoughts and ideas and make them into a reality more government funding would enable more culturally appropriate learning environments to meet the needs of our ako ora students.  In the meantime, our senior management team is looking at creative ways to engage our teachers in connecting with our local environments, indigenous history and local tikanga.  One of the ways has been creating 'An Amazing Race' for our staff to participate in, a bus tour of our local area.  In doing this it is hoped that the up skilling of teacher knowledge, will be shown in their learning and teaching.

References

Ministry of Education. (2011). Tātaiako: Cultural Competencies for Teachers of Māoir Learners.  Retrieved from https://educationcouncil.org.nz/required/Tataiako.pdf

Pohaut, T. W. (2011). Mauri-rethinking human wellbeing. Mai Review 3, 1-12. Retrieved from  http://review.mai.ac.nz/MR/article/viewFile/380/380-3362-1-PB.pdf

Core-Ed (2017) [Sketch-note Ann Milne Keynote Address). Retrieved from https://core-ed.org/events/ulearn/ulearn-resources/

Tamua, M. (2015). Te Takanga o te Wa - Māori History, Guidelines for Years 1-8, Wellington, Ministry of Education


Thursday, 26 July 2018

Week 30 - Trends Influencing NZ or Internationally



For this blog post I will be using Rolfe et al.s Model of Reflection (2001), based on three questions:

  1. What?
  2. So What?
  3. Now What?

Step 1 - What?

For the past three years I have downloaded and used Core-Ed Ten Trends documentation to inform my leadership and classroom practice.  Using their 2018 Ten Trends, I have noticed how similar they are with Daggart's (2014) identified five potential disruptive emerging trends:
  1. Impact of Digital Learning
  2. Heightened demand for career readiness
  3. Increased emphasis on application-based learning
  4. Use of data analytics for decision making
  5. Development of personal skills
The trend I find most relevant to me, as an e-learning coach, is the impact of digital learning.  I am interested in this trend through the impact digital learning and the collaborative tools it offers to the ako ora Māori (Māori priority learners) at my school.  This area became heightened throughout my literature review, which gave strength to the development of my teacher inquiry - How might the use of digital learning and collboration (physically and digitally), improve ako ora students learning outcomes in writing?

Step 2 - So What? 
There is plenty of research behind the trend I have identified.

Daggart (2014) states that it is very common for high school students to bring their phones to school and use them to communicate and problem solve with, in fact teaching in a primary school, this is becoming a more common sight, especially before and after school.  Smart phones and this connectivity, "provides the context for digital learners to connect, collaborate and create content in ways that are especially meaningful for them."

With the ability to access digital devices, the ability to access up to date information, and this information is global has made one of the biggest differences to students learning.  Unfortunately, I think this has developed us into an .. instant, now society.  We expect it to happen now! We expect to find the information now!  Daggart (2014) also notes that making change in schools is essential, however full of challenges, a challenge noted by Daggart could come from teachers who were not skilled or up to date with the ever changing technology.  This is seen with the variety of teacher skill base we have in our schools today.

Step 3 - Now what?

Digital learning, from an educators perspective cannot be ignored.  Our students today, are digital natives (Daggart, 2014), and as a teacher I need to ensure that I transfore, I improve, I keep up with necessary  changes, in order to provide the learning and best education available to our ako ora Maori learner needs.

Undertaking, The Mind Lab post grad qualification has helped and supported me to address this trend that has been identified.  It has helped me continue to up skill in this area, especially with the revised Digital Technologies curriculum that needs to be implemented from 2020.

The school I am at is well funded with up to date digital equipment. It has well designed policies and procedures, that we  respond by regularly, routinely  reviewing them - We call this the TAPS 4 R's, and by doing so our teaching and learning skills are always open to improvements by professional development

References

Core Education. (2018). Core Ten Trends 2018 Retrieved from https://www.core-ed.org/assets/Uploads/Ten-Trends-14May2018.pdf

Daggett, B. (2014). Addressing Current and Future Challenges in Education. Retrieved from http://www.leadered.com/pdf/2014MSC_AddressingCurrentandFutureChallenges.pdf

Magette, K. (2014). Embracing social media: a practical guide to manage risk and leverage opportunity. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com

Rolfe et al. (2001) Reflective Model. Retrieved from https://my.cumbria.ac.uk/media/MyCumbria/Documents/ReflectiveModelRolfe.pdf

Tuesday, 24 July 2018

Week 29, Professional Online Social Networks





For this weeks blog I will be using Jay and Johnson's (2002) reflective model.

Stage 1 - Descriptive

Prensky (2001) identifies who I am in a very clear and precise manner 'digital immigrant' when it comes to social media.  I am very confident when using most digital platforms and tools, however when it comes to social media, I tend to shy away from it.  I will post objective posts full of facts, however I don't like writing subjective posts, the posts where my opinion and thoughts are given.  I feel unqualified to give them but deep down I feel it is because I am weary about how or what other people might think of me.  In reflecting why I feel like this comes from the negative base of using social media; the on-line bullying, being able to hide away behind a keyboard and not have the kānohi ki te kānohi (face to face) relationships you form when facing someone and not being able to read another persons body language.  This is where knowing the difference between my personal and professional social media

Personal Social Media
  • Facebook - closed groups and private page
  • YouTube - viewing only
Professional Social Media
  • YouTube - creating and viewing
  • Facebook - NZ Teachers primary, BreakoutEDU, Senior Leaders NZ 
  • TedXed
  • Google Classroom
  • Seesaw
  • Google Suite
  • EdPuzzle
  • Kahoot

In saying this,  I find elements of social networks / media empowering and effective as a classroom release teacher (CRT). 

Stage 2 - Comparative

As a school senior leader with no classroom responsibilities, I provide CRT to 10 teachers, 2 days per teacher a term.  When I go into these classrooms I want to make an impact on my students learning with the limited time I am there.  

This year I have made the commitment  to develop my practice using the  'flipped classroom' models I have learnt during The Mind Lab tutorials.  I have been either creating YouTube clips or finding clips to help my student's learning for the upcoming days I am with them.  I have been using Google Classroom as a management system so my students can access their learning tasks, instructions, videos to help them in their learning organisation.  Many of the classrooms I go into, use Seesaw as their on-line learning journey.  They are able to post evidence of their learning, and currently I am working with staff in their development of becoming more active reflectors (Absolum, 2006), both as teachers and developing their students 'toolkit' in becoming more reflective on their learning.  Using the online collaborative tools that Google provides is also another form that teachers and students use in their everyday life.

These simple changes to my teaching has been a driving force behind the engagement to learning when I go into classrooms.  Student's are craving to know what they are going to be doing, where they are going and ownership of their own learning.

Stage 3 - Critical Reflection


Ethically, I think it is our responsibility to teach our student's to become more critical and socially aware of social media and the ramifications it holds.  At this point in time, I struggle to understand that a student (8-11 years old), needs to leave the confines of their school, community, whānau to engage with their learning.  Margette (2014) says that by embedding social media in the classroom helps to equip students with the skills and judgment to become effective communicators, which is also an essential 21st century learning skill our students need to continue to develop.  However,  I am not convinced that students of this age are maturely aware fo what it means and the responsibility  of belonging to the global world of social media.  The confines that Seesaw has, or the limitations that can be placed on uploading to YouTube is more than enough for this age group.  I am not yet prepared to allow my Year 3-6 students to use Twitter or Face book as an opportunity to connect with the wider global community.  

References

Absolum, M. (2006) Clarity in the classroom: Using formative assessment. Auckland, New Zealand: Hachette Livre NZ Ltd


Magette, K. (2014) Embracing social media: a practical guide to manage risk and leverage opportunity. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 

Prensky, M. (2001) On the Horizon Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1., Vol 9 Issue: 5 pp.1-6







Monday, 23 July 2018

Week 28 - Applied Practice in Context - Activity 4: Legal and Ethical Contexts in my Digital Practice

As digital technology is increasingly a natural part of our 'normal' education system, and students' access to the wider world at technology increases, we as educators are exposed to more and more ethical dilemmas. To reflect on a past ethical dilemma, I have used a reflective model by Rolfe, Freshwater, and Jasper (2001).


Background

At the point in time of this situation I was the school's e-Learning Coach. Part of my job description was supporting and guiding teachers when students were not using their digital devices appropriately.
This was one of those times.


Step One: What?

Earlier this year, a teacher approached me with a situation that involved students in her class. A student came to her and reported that a fellow student was being using the comments facility in Google Slides inappropriately by posting mean comments and using inappropriate language. The student informed her that another student in the same classroom had been shared to her and her friend.

The teacher investigated the allegation along with her co-teacher, as she works in an ILE situation. They looked at: who the owner of the document was, who had access to the document, the revision history and during which part of the school day this happened.


The evidence showed that the comment had been created by the very student who had reported the incident and her friend that had the comment 'shared' to. At this point in time, they confessed that they had made it up to get the other student in trouble. Upon further discussion, it became obvious that the two students had written the message together to get the other student in trouble and they were only 'joking'.



Step Two: So What?

Through using Hall's (2001) suggested guiding questions on the ethical process. I am able to form a clearer picture to support my decision making:

Which stake holder should be given priority? Why?

The innocent student, who had no idea what was going on. He was our first priority as this incident could have caused him unnecessary consequences and his reputation & mana be affected.

Which courses of action are possible?

  • 'Suspend' their google accounts for a predetermined set of time.
  • Contact whānau
  • Restrict their access while using digital technologies.
  • Focused learning times using the capability on Hapara Teacher Dashboard.
  • Place students in another Google Organisation, through Google Management console. This organisation will give them no access to writing comments, limited or no emailing facilities. This does not have to be indefinitely, scaffolding trust back into using digital technologies as part of learning.
  • Collaboration skills as a DAT - Deliberate Act of Teaching.

Step Three: Now What?

After looking at the evidence, talking to the teachers involved, guiding them through talking to their students and reviewing our school policies on digital technology and digital citizenship, it was decided that both students:
  • Would have the Google accounts suspended for a set time
  • After the suspension was lifted, they would be placed into a limited usage organisation through the Google Management console.
  • The teachers would plan to teach collaboration skills both physically and digitally.
These decisions were made to maintain the safety for all students.  Whānau were contacted and informed of the situation and their support was given.  

The innocent student was not informed of what had happened.  This was to minimise distress to him, however he was closely monitored so no other ramifications were directed to him.  This decision came from the guidelines that Netsafe published in 2017.  In particular the guiding principles for when responding to digital incidents within schools; "minimise student / staff distress or harm, maintain student / staff safety, focus on the behaviours - not the technology, follow school procedures."

At this point in time, a review was undertaken of our school policies and procedures using Netsafe (2017) guidelines.

References

Hall, A. (2001). What ought I to do, all things considered? An approach to the exploration of ethical problems by teachers.  IIPE Conference for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Brisbane, 8 April, (April) Retrieved from

Netsafe. (2017). Responding to Online Incidents.  Retrieved from 

Rolfe, G., Freshwater, D., Jasper, M. (2001) Critical reflection in nursing and helping professions: a user's guide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

Saturday, 14 April 2018

Week 19 - Community of Practice

Activity 3: Contribution of Teacher Inquiry Topics to my Communities of Practice
Create a reflective entry where you critically reflect on how two potential and inspiring digital and/or collaborative learning related teacher inquiry topics would contribute to your Communities of Practice. Your reflection should be based on a reflective model of your choice.


I am passionate about teaching, supporting and guiding teachers and how they use digital technologies and learning in their classroom to enhance students learning and achievement.  Over the past couple of years I have seen that teachers have literally had to rethink all that they know regarding teaching.  

Step 1 - Descriptive
While re-reading our topics from the first 16 weeks.  I'm overwhelmed by the what we have covered and actually how much I have learnt. It has been hard to bring it down to just two topics of interest and need so ... the topics  I'm interested in pursuing are:  
  • Implementing Technology Innovation in the Classroom
  • Maker Movement
Here is a screen shot from my first assignment and the more I have progressed throughout The Mind Lab course, the more convinced I am that digital practice through the SAMR model - Implementing Technology Innovation  in the classroom is the direction I would like to pursue in the community of practice.

In my thinking the Maker Movement also falls into this area where digital practice is a focus.

On reviewing what I know and my findings and based on the Pentudura, SAMR model (2013), the teachers at my school are very comfortable in using digital tools that fit within the Substitution and Augmentation levels of the model.  To challenge themselves and utilise the 21st century skills (ITL Research, 2015) that are important to our learners.






Step 2 - Comparative 

I'm quite excited about working in a CoP, especially coming off the first 16 weeks of The Mind Lab.  I have been very lucky we have had 6 members of our school community taking part in The Mind Lab Post-Grad course because it has lifted interest from other members of our staff ... What are they doing?  What are they learning?  What is happening in their classrooms?  Why are their students enjoying and engaged with their learning?

Hence, there is a core group of between 4-7 teachers who meet the requirements of being a CoP by:

  1. Being a Joint Enterprise - our overarching goals of raising student achievement are one and the same
  2. Mutual Engagement - by seeking impromptu moments to discuss what we are doing in our classes so we can work together in our learning environment.
  3. Share Repertoire - by planning together and sharing resources and ideas to help each other                                                           (Wenger, 2000)

Informally we have become a CoP.

Siemens (2005) supports the practice of being a CoP by stating that we no longer are expected to know everything, but instead make connections and form relationships that enable us to learn from others.  He also uses this to describe this as being the new theory of the digital age.

As this will not be a 'normal' team, as in the sense of a syndicate, it will be one that is made up organically through the mutual  passion and interest (Knox, 2009) there will have to be provisions on how  we meet, when we meet, if we meet - kānohi me te kānohi (face to face), Online Learning Network etc.  

Knox (2009) suggests that a CoP is one that will organically grow, however I feel if we have a model such as Kotter's 8 step process for leading change as guide of where we are heading, which ever path we take will be beneficial.  

(Retrieved from:  

Step 3 (Critical Reflection)

The teachers that we have formed is an informal CoP, during this reflective process it has allowed me understand and give structure to a concept that has been around for a long time.  This concept has provided a useful perspective on improving performance by learning (theory) and the doing (practice).

The theory of Keizen ... Continuous improvements through a systematic approach for long term goals. Is a theory that comes to mind to help our CoP with the two key points chosen as our focus.  Formalising our CoP I know will provide even richer experiences, ideas and learnings through having a wider expanse of experience and connections.


Kaizen 
(Retrieved from:  

References

Jay, J.K. Johnson, K.L (2002). Capturing complexity: a typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education,  18, 73-85

Knox, B. (2009). Cultivating Communities of Practice: Making Them Grow [Video File] Retrieved from:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhMPRZnRFkk 

Kotter, J. (1996). 8-Step Change Model [Image] Retrieved from: https://app.themindlab.com/course/release/2865-week-9-leadership-leading-change

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International journal of instructional technology and distance learning, 2(1), 3010.

Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems.  Organization, 7(2), 225-246



Tuesday, 10 April 2018

Week 18 - Future-oriented Learning and Teaching



Activity 2: Reflecting on changes in my future oriented teaching practice
Create a reflective entry to critically reflect upon how you have positively changed your practice during your postgraduate journey. Your reflections should be based on a suitable reflective model of your choice.


Step - 1 (Description) 

Theme 5 - A culture of continuous learning for teachers and educational leaders

There is a saying "If we're always going to do what we have always done, we're going to get what we're always got."

The event I am focussing this post on is "Moving to a blended classroom through the use of chrome books."  My role at school has been e-learning coach.

In hindsight, I would never have called myself as 'coach'.  I think my role has been more one of mentor.  Using the table from Colleen Douglas (2017),  gives a more sustainable focus to this change initiative I was leading.



Douglas, C. (2017), Keynote Leading Through Mentoring [course notes]


By understanding the differences, I have been able to guide and scaffold team leaders when re-modelling their thoughts and practices, and then in return, their role as team-leader has helped guide and scaffold support with their team members.


Step 2 - Feelings

A saying that has stuck with me since I was a beginning teacher (over 20 years ago) has been, "Educational Change is like being on a mutinous boat."  I wish I could remember the speaker who used this saying, however I can remember sitting their laughing alongside 3 friends freshly out of Teachers College, thinking how could this be because 'we' want the best for our students so why would anyone not want to change.

Many years later, this saying resonates in my mind.  Looking back over the change period from where we were to were we are now, where a blended learning classroom is the norm.  The Kubler-Ross model of the five stages of grief probably epitomises exactly the feelings of the leaders and teachers involved:

(Retrieved from: https://www.psycom.net/depression.central.grief.html )


Would I want to lead this change again? A big fat YES!  However, what I know now of leadership styles and theories would certainly effect how I would implement change.

Step 3 (Evaluation)

With the scaffolded and systematic approach I took to leading this change I know that a majority of teachers managed this change successfully.  The 'laggards' and 'late majority' certainly took a lot of my emotional and physical time.  I worked with these teachers 1:1, in hindsight I should of used most of my energies with the 'early adopters', and in turn given them responsibility by distributing leadership / mentoring opportunities for them to  flourish in.  

Knowing this now, will effect how I plan for any future change initiatives.

Step 4 (Analysis) & Step 5 (Conclusion)

Over the years, I feel the change models we have used have created  a culture of being told how to do something or as Dalton and Anderson (2013) state they have a limited or no use of 'Inquirer Capabilities'.  The supporting evidence:
  • We have undertaken a very scripted writing PLD for 5 years ... "I was too scared to say anything to ......., as I didn't want to be told off."  (Teacher A) ... "It was her way or the highway!" (Teacher B)
  • Up until 2017, Teacher Inquiry was never a priority with appraisal ... "I thought appraisals were to prove I was doing something, not improving on what I do." (Third Year Teacher)
In future change initiatives I lead I will be using the 'Art of Inquiry' model as created by Dalton and Anderson (2013).  Not only is it a model that promotes self-inquiry, it is a model that supports and scaffolds change.


Dalton and Anderson (2013), The Art of Inquiry

Step 6 - (Action Plan)

1. Listen
I will practice:
  • Not giving personal judgement
  • Pause - Reflect - Paraphrase
2. Inquire
I will practice:
  • Using an open voice
  • Use the language of inquiry (Dalton & Anderson, 2013, pg 35)
  • Clarify and probe starters (Dalton & Anderson, 2013, pg 35)

3. Advocate / Inquire
I will practice:
  • The Advocacy-Inquiry model (Dalton & Anderson, 2013)
  • Synthesis key points made throughout PLD sessions

4. Explore Perspectives, Differences and Possibilities
I will practice:
  • Honouring new and different ideas
  • Use the mighty 'might' word to explore other possibilities

5. The Final Word
I will take the time for critical feedback from the stakeholders (teachers, senior management, including myself). To help me grow forward in future changes I will lead, co-leader or mentor a future leader through.


References

Anderson, D (2012), Workshop Art of Facilitation [Course Notes}. Leading Adult Learners, Te Awamutu Primary, Te Awamutu

Dalton, J & Anderson, D. (2010), Learning Talk 1: Build Understanding. Retrieved from https://www.leadingadultlearners.com/pages/online-store


Dalton, J & Anderson, D. (2010), Learning Talk 4: Develop the art of inquiry. Retrieved from https://www.leadingadultlearners.com/pages/online-store


Douglas, C. (2017). Keynote Leading Through Mentoring [course notes], Kahikatea Tū te Uru - Leading through Mentoring growing support systems and expertise in you and your place, TRCC, Wellington, New Zealand