Sunday, 29 July 2018

Week 32 - Key Change to Reflective Practice

It certainly has been 32 weeks with many ups and a few downs.  The ups have certainly outweighed the downs.  Change of jobs and change of principal has certainly effected both the ups and downs. 

Just about there ... one more post and it's over, or is it?


Step 1 - What?

The last part of the question that ends with ... or is it?, actually forms this part of my last reflection for Mindlab.  Each week Mindlab has made connections with Our Code And Standards.  The one key change in my professional practice is linked to the standard of professional learning.

Professional learning - Use inquiry, collaborative problem-solving and professional learning to improve professional capability to impact on the learning and achievement of all learners.

What Mindlab has gifted to me is my keenness to learn, and the more I learn the more I can make a difference to my students, and the more it effects them it will effect their future.  Mindlab has made me a more reflective educator.  As Osterman and Kottkamp (2015) state, "Learning is most effective when people become personally engaged in the learning process and engagement is most likely to place when there is a need to learn".  In our course notes this week, they (Osterman and Kottkamp, 1993) also suggested the difference as to how teachers/schools have traditionally undertaken professional learning e.g. bringing in facilitators, sending teachers to acquire knowledge on a course, whereas there is more ownership and upskilling when the teacher uses reflective practice.  This is where the real change takes place ... "behaviours via self-awareness. 

This is where The Mindlab has taken me!

Step 2 - Now What?

Stage 1 - Problem Identification

As I identified in assignment 1, limited or no 'active reflection' (Absolum, 2006), was happening amongst many of the teachers throughout our school, this in turn saw limited or no active reflection happening amongst our students, therefore our students were perhaps, not in touch, owned or even progressed as fast as they might have been, if they were.  It is very important that active reflection becomes part of our, teacher and student, learning cycle.  As we move into our online digital portfolios (Blogs) for all our students, this is certainly becoming more relevant instead of just being a storage of learning tasks.

Stage 2 - Observation & Analysis

This stage became a focus for me when I collected data on what students were posting on their learning blogs.  

(Evidence from my Assignment 1)

Not only was it straight from the 'students' blogs, it was from discussions held with fellow colleagues who had very limited knowledge of Assessment for Learning, and the learning principals that underpin this very important strategy offered by the Ministry of Education.

Stage 3 - Conceptualization

Mindlab has given me the tools and skills to ask those key questions of myself as an educator, and myself as a leader of learning AND follow up with research that form my ideas, thoughts and actions.

Thinking reflectively demands relatively complex mental process and requires the subject of a thought process to become its object.  For example, having applied themselves to mastering a particular mental technique, reflectiveness allows individuals to then think about his technique, assimilate it, relate it to other aspects of their experiences and to change or adapt it.  Individuals who are reflective also follow up such thought processes with practice or action’
(OECD, 2005 - Absolum, 2006)

S6)

Stage 4 - Active Experimentation

This is where it has become really exciting ... Not only have I just become a Deputy Principal, another fellow co-Mindlab student has become the other Deputy Principal at my school.  Having two of us on board has made it easier making changes, implementing new ideas, discussing like-minded ideas on research and/or theories.

In our staffroom, our PLD wall now shows key signs; 
  • What?
  • Now What?
  • So What?
We have identified the 'early adopters' and have started conversations with them using Rolfe's model of reflection

When we have gone into classrooms, we have rounded off our lessons using the same model, posting the student's reflections on the wall, or on their class blogs.

And ... some of our 'early adopters' are doing the same.  It is exciting to see our roller coaster gain traction.

Step 3 - So What?

The school has approached an outside provider to come and work with us for a year, with the focus on Assessment For Learning.  Which will then continue the small learning and teaching we are working with our staff on.  

Since, undertaking Mindlab, many of our teachers have grown an interest of what we have been learning, they have observed us making changes to our own practice, and they are taking part in the professional conversations we are having.

References

Absolum, M. (2006). Clarity in the classroom: Using formative assessment. Auckland, New Zealand: Hachette Livre NZ Ltd.

Osterman, K. & Kottkamp, R.(1993). Reflective Practice for Educators.California.Corwin Press, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.itslifejimbutn otasweknowit.org.uk/files

Osterman, K. F., & Kottkamp, R. B. (2015). Reflective practice for educators: professional development to improve student learning.(2nd ed.) New York: Skyhorse Publishing.

Ministry of Education (2017). Our code, our standards. Retrieved from



Week 31 - Indigenous Knowledge and Cultural Responsiveness





Again, in this blog post I will be  using Rolfe et al.s Model of Reflection(2001)

  1. What?
  2. So What?
  3. Now What?

Step 1 - What?

I was lucky enough to hear Dr Ann Milne speak at uLearn 2017.  Her key message is reflected in the above sketch-note.  There were may challenges I took from her keynote but the key one is reflected in the yellow outlined box.  To enable kids to be Māori, cultural identity has to be embedded in every activity of the school day.

Image result for ann milne ulearn 2017

I always thought of myself as being extremely culturally aware and responsive.  Why? Because I'm Māori of course.  However, upon hearing Anne Milne speak words are not enough to express how thought provoking her message was.

I ask myself and the  teachers at my school how do our Māori learners see that we value their culture rather than, and I quote Milne (2013), "learn about the place of colour and the importance of staying within the pre-determined boundaries and expectations."

Step 2 - So What?

We have different levels of the Mauri Model happening in at our school.  The Senior Management team, which I am part or, is actively working at within the Te Taunga o te Mauri Moe - State of Being of Mauri Ora (Actions and Expressions of  TRANSFORMATIVE LEADERSHIP)

I led our  whānau group and staff through the  development of our local Maniapoto curriculum where our vision is: By the time all our students graduate from our school they will have a connection with and knowledge of our local Manapoto landmarks, histories, values and tikanga.  This document supports teachers planning and making learning more authentic and meaningful by focusing on our local area.  Our school Maniapoto document is modelled from Te Takanga o Te Wa, Ministry of Education publication.

However, I feel we still have many of our teachers within Te Taunga o te Mauri Moe - State of Being of Mauri Oho (Level 1: Actions and Expressions of INACTIVITY.)    Signage that is up but never  used or referred to, they were great 'place holders' on the wall.  Some stand alone te reo lessons  that they  can tick off to say the had 'done' that lesson, but only ever used in the 20 minutes a week it is given.

What has been exciting this year is the employment of teachers who are 'Te Taunga o te Mauri Moe - State of Being of Mauri Oho (Actions and Expressions of PROACTIVE.)  Attempting to build relationships with whānau and are actively engaged in all tuturu Māori

Step 3 - Now What?

I believe that our school needs to create a multi levelled learning environment where traditional Māori methods, such as tuakana / teina, as described my the Ministry of Education TKI website - site 1site 2.  To achieve many of these thoughts and ideas and make them into a reality more government funding would enable more culturally appropriate learning environments to meet the needs of our ako ora students.  In the meantime, our senior management team is looking at creative ways to engage our teachers in connecting with our local environments, indigenous history and local tikanga.  One of the ways has been creating 'An Amazing Race' for our staff to participate in, a bus tour of our local area.  In doing this it is hoped that the up skilling of teacher knowledge, will be shown in their learning and teaching.

References

Ministry of Education. (2011). Tātaiako: Cultural Competencies for Teachers of Māoir Learners.  Retrieved from https://educationcouncil.org.nz/required/Tataiako.pdf

Pohaut, T. W. (2011). Mauri-rethinking human wellbeing. Mai Review 3, 1-12. Retrieved from  http://review.mai.ac.nz/MR/article/viewFile/380/380-3362-1-PB.pdf

Core-Ed (2017) [Sketch-note Ann Milne Keynote Address). Retrieved from https://core-ed.org/events/ulearn/ulearn-resources/

Tamua, M. (2015). Te Takanga o te Wa - Māori History, Guidelines for Years 1-8, Wellington, Ministry of Education


Thursday, 26 July 2018

Week 30 - Trends Influencing NZ or Internationally



For this blog post I will be using Rolfe et al.s Model of Reflection (2001), based on three questions:

  1. What?
  2. So What?
  3. Now What?

Step 1 - What?

For the past three years I have downloaded and used Core-Ed Ten Trends documentation to inform my leadership and classroom practice.  Using their 2018 Ten Trends, I have noticed how similar they are with Daggart's (2014) identified five potential disruptive emerging trends:
  1. Impact of Digital Learning
  2. Heightened demand for career readiness
  3. Increased emphasis on application-based learning
  4. Use of data analytics for decision making
  5. Development of personal skills
The trend I find most relevant to me, as an e-learning coach, is the impact of digital learning.  I am interested in this trend through the impact digital learning and the collaborative tools it offers to the ako ora Māori (Māori priority learners) at my school.  This area became heightened throughout my literature review, which gave strength to the development of my teacher inquiry - How might the use of digital learning and collboration (physically and digitally), improve ako ora students learning outcomes in writing?

Step 2 - So What? 
There is plenty of research behind the trend I have identified.

Daggart (2014) states that it is very common for high school students to bring their phones to school and use them to communicate and problem solve with, in fact teaching in a primary school, this is becoming a more common sight, especially before and after school.  Smart phones and this connectivity, "provides the context for digital learners to connect, collaborate and create content in ways that are especially meaningful for them."

With the ability to access digital devices, the ability to access up to date information, and this information is global has made one of the biggest differences to students learning.  Unfortunately, I think this has developed us into an .. instant, now society.  We expect it to happen now! We expect to find the information now!  Daggart (2014) also notes that making change in schools is essential, however full of challenges, a challenge noted by Daggart could come from teachers who were not skilled or up to date with the ever changing technology.  This is seen with the variety of teacher skill base we have in our schools today.

Step 3 - Now what?

Digital learning, from an educators perspective cannot be ignored.  Our students today, are digital natives (Daggart, 2014), and as a teacher I need to ensure that I transfore, I improve, I keep up with necessary  changes, in order to provide the learning and best education available to our ako ora Maori learner needs.

Undertaking, The Mind Lab post grad qualification has helped and supported me to address this trend that has been identified.  It has helped me continue to up skill in this area, especially with the revised Digital Technologies curriculum that needs to be implemented from 2020.

The school I am at is well funded with up to date digital equipment. It has well designed policies and procedures, that we  respond by regularly, routinely  reviewing them - We call this the TAPS 4 R's, and by doing so our teaching and learning skills are always open to improvements by professional development

References

Core Education. (2018). Core Ten Trends 2018 Retrieved from https://www.core-ed.org/assets/Uploads/Ten-Trends-14May2018.pdf

Daggett, B. (2014). Addressing Current and Future Challenges in Education. Retrieved from http://www.leadered.com/pdf/2014MSC_AddressingCurrentandFutureChallenges.pdf

Magette, K. (2014). Embracing social media: a practical guide to manage risk and leverage opportunity. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com

Rolfe et al. (2001) Reflective Model. Retrieved from https://my.cumbria.ac.uk/media/MyCumbria/Documents/ReflectiveModelRolfe.pdf

Tuesday, 24 July 2018

Week 29, Professional Online Social Networks





For this weeks blog I will be using Jay and Johnson's (2002) reflective model.

Stage 1 - Descriptive

Prensky (2001) identifies who I am in a very clear and precise manner 'digital immigrant' when it comes to social media.  I am very confident when using most digital platforms and tools, however when it comes to social media, I tend to shy away from it.  I will post objective posts full of facts, however I don't like writing subjective posts, the posts where my opinion and thoughts are given.  I feel unqualified to give them but deep down I feel it is because I am weary about how or what other people might think of me.  In reflecting why I feel like this comes from the negative base of using social media; the on-line bullying, being able to hide away behind a keyboard and not have the kānohi ki te kānohi (face to face) relationships you form when facing someone and not being able to read another persons body language.  This is where knowing the difference between my personal and professional social media

Personal Social Media
  • Facebook - closed groups and private page
  • YouTube - viewing only
Professional Social Media
  • YouTube - creating and viewing
  • Facebook - NZ Teachers primary, BreakoutEDU, Senior Leaders NZ 
  • TedXed
  • Google Classroom
  • Seesaw
  • Google Suite
  • EdPuzzle
  • Kahoot

In saying this,  I find elements of social networks / media empowering and effective as a classroom release teacher (CRT). 

Stage 2 - Comparative

As a school senior leader with no classroom responsibilities, I provide CRT to 10 teachers, 2 days per teacher a term.  When I go into these classrooms I want to make an impact on my students learning with the limited time I am there.  

This year I have made the commitment  to develop my practice using the  'flipped classroom' models I have learnt during The Mind Lab tutorials.  I have been either creating YouTube clips or finding clips to help my student's learning for the upcoming days I am with them.  I have been using Google Classroom as a management system so my students can access their learning tasks, instructions, videos to help them in their learning organisation.  Many of the classrooms I go into, use Seesaw as their on-line learning journey.  They are able to post evidence of their learning, and currently I am working with staff in their development of becoming more active reflectors (Absolum, 2006), both as teachers and developing their students 'toolkit' in becoming more reflective on their learning.  Using the online collaborative tools that Google provides is also another form that teachers and students use in their everyday life.

These simple changes to my teaching has been a driving force behind the engagement to learning when I go into classrooms.  Student's are craving to know what they are going to be doing, where they are going and ownership of their own learning.

Stage 3 - Critical Reflection


Ethically, I think it is our responsibility to teach our student's to become more critical and socially aware of social media and the ramifications it holds.  At this point in time, I struggle to understand that a student (8-11 years old), needs to leave the confines of their school, community, whānau to engage with their learning.  Margette (2014) says that by embedding social media in the classroom helps to equip students with the skills and judgment to become effective communicators, which is also an essential 21st century learning skill our students need to continue to develop.  However,  I am not convinced that students of this age are maturely aware fo what it means and the responsibility  of belonging to the global world of social media.  The confines that Seesaw has, or the limitations that can be placed on uploading to YouTube is more than enough for this age group.  I am not yet prepared to allow my Year 3-6 students to use Twitter or Face book as an opportunity to connect with the wider global community.  

References

Absolum, M. (2006) Clarity in the classroom: Using formative assessment. Auckland, New Zealand: Hachette Livre NZ Ltd


Magette, K. (2014) Embracing social media: a practical guide to manage risk and leverage opportunity. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 

Prensky, M. (2001) On the Horizon Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1., Vol 9 Issue: 5 pp.1-6







Monday, 23 July 2018

Week 28 - Applied Practice in Context - Activity 4: Legal and Ethical Contexts in my Digital Practice

As digital technology is increasingly a natural part of our 'normal' education system, and students' access to the wider world at technology increases, we as educators are exposed to more and more ethical dilemmas. To reflect on a past ethical dilemma, I have used a reflective model by Rolfe, Freshwater, and Jasper (2001).


Background

At the point in time of this situation I was the school's e-Learning Coach. Part of my job description was supporting and guiding teachers when students were not using their digital devices appropriately.
This was one of those times.


Step One: What?

Earlier this year, a teacher approached me with a situation that involved students in her class. A student came to her and reported that a fellow student was being using the comments facility in Google Slides inappropriately by posting mean comments and using inappropriate language. The student informed her that another student in the same classroom had been shared to her and her friend.

The teacher investigated the allegation along with her co-teacher, as she works in an ILE situation. They looked at: who the owner of the document was, who had access to the document, the revision history and during which part of the school day this happened.


The evidence showed that the comment had been created by the very student who had reported the incident and her friend that had the comment 'shared' to. At this point in time, they confessed that they had made it up to get the other student in trouble. Upon further discussion, it became obvious that the two students had written the message together to get the other student in trouble and they were only 'joking'.



Step Two: So What?

Through using Hall's (2001) suggested guiding questions on the ethical process. I am able to form a clearer picture to support my decision making:

Which stake holder should be given priority? Why?

The innocent student, who had no idea what was going on. He was our first priority as this incident could have caused him unnecessary consequences and his reputation & mana be affected.

Which courses of action are possible?

  • 'Suspend' their google accounts for a predetermined set of time.
  • Contact whānau
  • Restrict their access while using digital technologies.
  • Focused learning times using the capability on Hapara Teacher Dashboard.
  • Place students in another Google Organisation, through Google Management console. This organisation will give them no access to writing comments, limited or no emailing facilities. This does not have to be indefinitely, scaffolding trust back into using digital technologies as part of learning.
  • Collaboration skills as a DAT - Deliberate Act of Teaching.

Step Three: Now What?

After looking at the evidence, talking to the teachers involved, guiding them through talking to their students and reviewing our school policies on digital technology and digital citizenship, it was decided that both students:
  • Would have the Google accounts suspended for a set time
  • After the suspension was lifted, they would be placed into a limited usage organisation through the Google Management console.
  • The teachers would plan to teach collaboration skills both physically and digitally.
These decisions were made to maintain the safety for all students.  Whānau were contacted and informed of the situation and their support was given.  

The innocent student was not informed of what had happened.  This was to minimise distress to him, however he was closely monitored so no other ramifications were directed to him.  This decision came from the guidelines that Netsafe published in 2017.  In particular the guiding principles for when responding to digital incidents within schools; "minimise student / staff distress or harm, maintain student / staff safety, focus on the behaviours - not the technology, follow school procedures."

At this point in time, a review was undertaken of our school policies and procedures using Netsafe (2017) guidelines.

References

Hall, A. (2001). What ought I to do, all things considered? An approach to the exploration of ethical problems by teachers.  IIPE Conference for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Brisbane, 8 April, (April) Retrieved from

Netsafe. (2017). Responding to Online Incidents.  Retrieved from 

Rolfe, G., Freshwater, D., Jasper, M. (2001) Critical reflection in nursing and helping professions: a user's guide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan